E-Mail 'Chocolate Condoms for breakfast' To A Friend

* Required Field






Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 5 entries.



Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 5 entries.


E-Mail Image Verification

Loading ... Loading ...

This post was published on 22/05/08 in Condomania.

Send this post to a friend Send this post to a friend

3 comments

You can follow the comments on this post via this RSS feed.

Tags: , .

  1. Comment by Candy Gourlay, 23/05/08, 01:28:

    durian flavoured … i’m a homesick southeast asian but never ever homesick for durian. highly recommended for chastity campaigners trying to put people off sex forever.

  2. Comment by Chris Green, 24/05/08, 03:11:

    Obviously I’m missing something, but it seems to me that we can only experience flavoured condoms if we indulge in oral sex – unless there’s something (else) about the female anatomy that I don’t understand.
    To me, if I want to get the durian flavour, I’d rather suck a durian-flavoured iced-lolly than a durian-flavoured penis. But if I am indulging in oral sex, what I want (among others) is ‘natural’ flavour (flesh, preferably clean), rather than the rather unpleasant (to me) combination of latex and lubricant – or durian. Is there really no demand for a flesh-flavoured condom, or would it be too difficult to produce or to promote?

  3. Comment by Lee Rudolph, 24/05/08, 12:03:

    “But if I am indulging in oral sex, what I want (among others) is ‘natural’ flavour (flesh, preferably clean)”

    I think (hope) you mean ‘skin’, not ‘flesh’. That minor point aside, your plan is brilliant. As to whether it would “be too difficult to produce or to promote”, I am guessing that neither is so–the world has simply been waiting for someone (you) to come along and think outside the box. As it were.

    In fact, there is a long and honorable tradition of jokes on this theme (documented by the late Gershon Legman in his magesterial _Rationale of the Dirty Joke_), which shows that the idea has arisen before, but also that (at least if we adopt Legman’s post-Freudian perspective) it aroused anxiety that had to be deflected by joking, so as to prevent any other action.

Comments are closed at this time.