<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Wisdom of Whores &#187; blogosphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/tag/blogosphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisdomofwhores.com</link>
	<description>Of sex and science. Elizabeth Pisani's blog about HIV and other sundry things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:34:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Of panics and pandemics</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2009/05/13/of-panics-and-pandemics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2009/05/13/of-panics-and-pandemics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elizabeth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pisani's picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pandemic influenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pandemics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/?p=1588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, I gave a talk in Norway called &#8220;Panic in Perspective: Science, Media and the Creation of Pandemics&#8221;. I chose the title months ago, and had no idea how topical it would turn out to be. The downside was that instead of exploring the beauty of Bergen in a kayak, I had to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, I gave a talk in Norway called &#8220;Panic in Perspective: Science, Media and the Creation of Pandemics&#8221;. I chose the title months ago, and had no idea how topical it would turn out to be. The downside was that instead of <a href="http://padling.uib.no/english">exploring the beauty of Bergen in a kayak</a>, I had to spend the weekend tracking news coverage of swine flu. Predictably enough, the poets laureate of headline writing on the British tabloid The Sun came up with the best front page to proclaim the impending &#8220;pandemic&#8221;:</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/pig-ear.jpg" alt="The Sun on the arrival of swine flu in Britain*" title="pig-ear" width="249" height="320" class="size-full wp-image-1589" /></p>
<p>Why do I say &#8220;pandemic&#8221;? Because my understanding of pandemic influenza is that it involves three things:<br />
a) a virus which is new to humans (and so we have no immunity to)<br />
b) a virus that spreads easily from human to human<br />
c) a virus which makes people very ill, or kills them</p>
<p> Using data up to Sunday, I made this graph:</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/flu_graph.jpg" alt="flu_graph" title="flu_graph" width="400" height="245" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1596" /></p>
<p>As you can see, avian flu ticks boxes a) and c) but not b). Swine flu ticks boxes a) and <del datetime="2009-05-17T18:50:39+00:00">c), but apparently not b)</del> b), but apparently not c). Don&#8217;t forget that for both types of flu the death rates are probably overestimates, because this is registered deaths of registered cases. People who get only mildly sick are far less likely to be in contact with the health system and be tested for the flu strain &#8212; so they&#8217;re far less likely to be registered as a case &#8212; than the severe cases who die. The less virulent the infection is, the bigger the overestimate is likely to be. It&#8217;s likely that there have been tens of thousands of unregistered cases of swine flu in Mexico, and that only the most severe have made it into the country&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/01/health/01oaxaca.html">miserably overburdened and inequitable</a> health system.</p>
<p>There has been more coverage of flu in the last two weeks than at any time since George Bush announced the pandemic preparedness plan at the end of 2005 (more than three years after the first person died of bird flu, so not-all-that-prepared plan might be more accurate). It&#8217;s all over the blogosphere, too, of course. One very good blog that I track when I&#8217;m doing my day job and that rejoices in the uninspired name of <a href="http://crofsblogs.typepad.com/h5n1/">H5N1</a> is visited by about 400 sad, sciency nerds like myself on any given day. At the height of the swine flu scare, it was getting over 8,000 hits in a day. </p>
<p>One of the things that amused me as I tracked the news feeding frenzy around swine flu was how quickly it turned into cannibalism. By week two, news outlets (including my former employers) were running <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/middleeastCrisis/idUKN28351698">news coverage about the news coverage</a>. I mentioned this in my talk in Bergen. Afterwards, a journalist from Norwegian TV came up rather sheepishly and asked for an interview, because they were doing a story about the media coverage of swine flu&#8230;. </p>
<p>Thanks to James, who recognises the poetic genius of The Sun and <a href="http://sunheadlines.blogspot.com/">archives their better headlines.</a> And to David, who gave me the key to the other archive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2009/05/13/of-panics-and-pandemics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should professors be human, too?</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2008/03/21/should-professors-be-human-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2008/03/21/should-professors-be-human-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elizabeth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communicating science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2008/03/21/should-professors-be-human-too/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Professors are baring their souls and tastes on line, Stephanie Rosenblum of The New York Times reports with some incredulity. She rightly questions whether sharing your taste in music and your cat snaps with students really makes you a better teacher. &#8220;Sam Gosling, a psychologist and an associate professor at the University of Texas at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professors are baring their souls and tastes on line, Stephanie Rosenblum of The New York Times <a href= "http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/20/fashion/20professor.html">reports with some incredulity</a>. She rightly questions whether sharing your taste in music and your cat snaps with students really makes you a better teacher. </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Sam Gosling, a psychologist and an associate professor at the University of Texas at Austin, who has about 300 students on his MySpace page, said there are students today who think professors are not doing their jobs unless they convey information in zany, interactive ways.&#8221; </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hmm. A good educator <strong>conveys</strong> information, certainly (rather than simply spouting it). If interactive teaching techniques help implant information in the mind of a student, by all means use them. But I&#8217;d argue that you should ensure that the information you&#8217;re conveying is of some use to the students. More use than what your cats had for breakfast or what you like to listen to on your i-pod when you&#8217;re out kayaking.</p>
<p>Many professors are apparently spending their time making friends on Facebook in the hopes of making themselves more likeable. More likeable may mean higher ratings on the (sometimes quite vicious) student rating system <a href= "http://ratemyprofessors.com/">RateMyProfessors.com</a>. And who knows, in this list-obsessed world of ours, higher ratings may turn into a higher salary, or a better job. I note with interest that the schools with the highest rated professors are not the Ivy League by any means. Number one is the Mormon <a href= "http://www.byu.edu/">Brigham Young University</a> in Utah. Hot on its heels is <a href= "http://www.selu.edu/">Southeastern Louisiana University</a>. Perhaps the faculty at these lesser known schools have to try harder. Or perhaps the students at Ivy League schools are too busy learning useful things to spend time rating their professors on line. Many professors obviously take student&#8217;s acerbic comments rather seriously, seriously enough to <a href="http://professorsstrikeback.mtvu.com">respond on video</a>. But I wonder how important &#8220;likeability&#8221; is in a teacher. A good teacher has a passion for their subject and a drive to communicate that passion. You can be really quite unlikeable and still do that very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2008/03/21/should-professors-be-human-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
