<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fire, brimstone and AIDS activists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2008/06/25/fire-brimstone-and-aids-activists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2008/06/25/fire-brimstone-and-aids-activists/</link>
	<description>Of sex and science. Elizabeth Pisani's blog about HIV and other sundry things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 02:54:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca A.</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2008/06/25/fire-brimstone-and-aids-activists/comment-page-1/#comment-1192</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/?p=421#comment-1192</guid>
		<description>I _did_ read _Wisdom of Whores_ (and enjoyed it enormously and reviewed it favorably over on livejournal). I agree that in that sequence, David Barr comes off quite well. Gregg&#039;s (?) characterization of your statements (at least in the book) is not on-target. I run into this kind of problem a lot, where someone skims and misses qualifiers and thus completely misunderstands a point or position and that appears to be what happened there.

I read _Fatal Misconceptions_ immediately before _Wisdom of Whores_ which gave me a weird perspective on UN/global &quot;health&quot; movements, particularly of the we&#039;ll do this one thing but won&#039;t supply you with decent health care AND we&#039;ll in fact take money away from what primary care you have for our current pet project (in _Fatal Misconceptions_, population control). I am, therefore, very sympathetic to people who hope/dream/believe that maybe money sloshing around a particular high-profile concern could be redirected to answer a dire need that is being ignored -- but I have a hard time subscribing to it myself.

I also know -- because I&#039;ve only ever lived in the US -- that getting people in the US to accept the idea of health care as a basic right is very, very, very hard. Which is going to be a big obstacle to getting the US to (consistently) fund something elsewhere that they can&#039;t even bring themselves to fund at home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I _did_ read _Wisdom of Whores_ (and enjoyed it enormously and reviewed it favorably over on livejournal). I agree that in that sequence, David Barr comes off quite well. Gregg&#8217;s (?) characterization of your statements (at least in the book) is not on-target. I run into this kind of problem a lot, where someone skims and misses qualifiers and thus completely misunderstands a point or position and that appears to be what happened there.</p>
<p>I read _Fatal Misconceptions_ immediately before _Wisdom of Whores_ which gave me a weird perspective on UN/global &#8220;health&#8221; movements, particularly of the we&#8217;ll do this one thing but won&#8217;t supply you with decent health care AND we&#8217;ll in fact take money away from what primary care you have for our current pet project (in _Fatal Misconceptions_, population control). I am, therefore, very sympathetic to people who hope/dream/believe that maybe money sloshing around a particular high-profile concern could be redirected to answer a dire need that is being ignored &#8212; but I have a hard time subscribing to it myself.</p>
<p>I also know &#8212; because I&#8217;ve only ever lived in the US &#8212; that getting people in the US to accept the idea of health care as a basic right is very, very, very hard. Which is going to be a big obstacle to getting the US to (consistently) fund something elsewhere that they can&#8217;t even bring themselves to fund at home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

