<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chocolate Condoms for breakfast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2008/05/22/chocolate-condoms-for-breakfast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2008/05/22/chocolate-condoms-for-breakfast/</link>
	<description>Of sex and science. Elizabeth Pisani's blog about HIV and other sundry things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 02:54:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Rudolph</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2008/05/22/chocolate-condoms-for-breakfast/comment-page-1/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Rudolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 11:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2008/05/22/chocolate-condoms-for-breakfast/#comment-834</guid>
		<description>&quot;But if I am indulging in oral sex, what I want (among others) is ‘natural’ flavour (flesh, preferably clean)&quot;

I think (hope) you mean &#039;skin&#039;, not &#039;flesh&#039;.  That minor point aside, your plan is brilliant. As to whether it would &quot;be too difficult to produce or to promote&quot;, I am guessing that neither is so--the world has simply been waiting for someone (you) to come along and think outside the box.  As it were.

In fact, there is a long and honorable tradition of jokes on this theme (documented by the late Gershon Legman in his magesterial _Rationale of the Dirty Joke_), which shows that the idea has arisen before, but also that (at least if we adopt Legman&#039;s post-Freudian perspective) it aroused anxiety that had to be deflected by joking, so as to prevent any other action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But if I am indulging in oral sex, what I want (among others) is ‘natural’ flavour (flesh, preferably clean)&#8221;</p>
<p>I think (hope) you mean &#8216;skin&#8217;, not &#8216;flesh&#8217;.  That minor point aside, your plan is brilliant. As to whether it would &#8220;be too difficult to produce or to promote&#8221;, I am guessing that neither is so&#8211;the world has simply been waiting for someone (you) to come along and think outside the box.  As it were.</p>
<p>In fact, there is a long and honorable tradition of jokes on this theme (documented by the late Gershon Legman in his magesterial _Rationale of the Dirty Joke_), which shows that the idea has arisen before, but also that (at least if we adopt Legman&#8217;s post-Freudian perspective) it aroused anxiety that had to be deflected by joking, so as to prevent any other action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Green</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2008/05/22/chocolate-condoms-for-breakfast/comment-page-1/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 02:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2008/05/22/chocolate-condoms-for-breakfast/#comment-833</guid>
		<description>Obviously I&#039;m missing something, but it seems to me that we can only experience flavoured condoms if we indulge in oral sex - unless there&#039;s something (else) about the female anatomy that I don&#039;t understand.
To me, if I want to get the durian flavour, I&#039;d rather suck a durian-flavoured iced-lolly than a durian-flavoured penis. But if I am indulging in oral sex, what I want (among others) is &#039;natural&#039; flavour (flesh, preferably clean), rather than the rather unpleasant (to me) combination of latex and lubricant - or durian. Is there really no demand for a flesh-flavoured condom, or would it be too difficult to produce or to promote?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously I&#8217;m missing something, but it seems to me that we can only experience flavoured condoms if we indulge in oral sex &#8211; unless there&#8217;s something (else) about the female anatomy that I don&#8217;t understand.<br />
To me, if I want to get the durian flavour, I&#8217;d rather suck a durian-flavoured iced-lolly than a durian-flavoured penis. But if I am indulging in oral sex, what I want (among others) is &#8216;natural&#8217; flavour (flesh, preferably clean), rather than the rather unpleasant (to me) combination of latex and lubricant &#8211; or durian. Is there really no demand for a flesh-flavoured condom, or would it be too difficult to produce or to promote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candy Gourlay</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2008/05/22/chocolate-condoms-for-breakfast/comment-page-1/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>Candy Gourlay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 12:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2008/05/22/chocolate-condoms-for-breakfast/#comment-831</guid>
		<description>durian flavoured ... i&#039;m a homesick southeast asian but never ever homesick for durian. highly recommended for chastity campaigners trying to put people off sex forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>durian flavoured &#8230; i&#8217;m a homesick southeast asian but never ever homesick for durian. highly recommended for chastity campaigners trying to put people off sex forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

